Speaking · Task 5 of 8
Comparing and Persuading
One of 8 tasks, judged as a whole rather than question by question.
How long you get
30 seconds to prepare, then 60 seconds of recording
Not published by the test provider. Check it against the free Starter Set.
What this section does to you
You will speak your answer to each task aloud, and it will be recorded.
Each task gives you preparation time, then recording begins on its own and stops on its own. There is no retake and no way to hear your answer back.
Each task is judged as a whole against the published Performance Standards dimensions, not on a checklist.
What is judged
Each task is judged as a whole on these dimensions, published as part of the Performance Standards. The level-by-level descriptors behind them are not published, so nobody — us included — can tell you exactly where one level ends and the next begins.
- Content/Coherence
- Vocabulary
- Listenability
- Task Fulfillment
Source: CELPIP Performance Standards for Writing and Speaking (PDF, © 2023 Prometric)
How to approach Task 5
This task asks for two jobs at once. You compare: you show why your choice beats the alternatives, not just why it is good. You persuade: you speak to a named person and try to change what they will do, so your reasons have to matter to them, not only to you. A strong response sounds like an organized argument aimed at a real listener, built from the details the task gives you.
Step by step
Read the options and the person before you choose
Look at what each option offers, then at who you are persuading and anything the task says about their situation. That person's needs are your target. A reason that fits their situation will carry more weight than a reason that only fits yours.
Choose quickly, and choose the easiest option to argue
You do not have to pick your personal favourite. Pick the option with the most clear, concrete advantages for this person. Then commit to it and stop weighing, because second thoughts during preparation eat the time you need for planning.
Turn each reason into a comparison
For each reason, name a feature of your choice and set it against a weakness or gap in the options you did not choose. Attach a specific detail from the task, or a short example of how it would play out for the person. This keeps you comparing instead of simply describing.
Put your reasons in order and ready a close
Plan a brief opening that tells the person your choice, then your strongest reason, then the next ones. If you can, think of the best point in favour of a rejected option and how you would answer it. Decide your closing recommendation now so you can reach it at any moment.
Speak to the person, and adjust to the clock
Talk as if the person is in front of you, using their name or addressing them directly. Move through your reasons in the planned order. If time is left, add more detail to a reason; if time feels short, finish your current point and go straight to your close.
Using the time
At the start, during preparation, spend a short moment choosing and most of it lining up your comparisons and your close. Do not script sentences; plan points. Once recording begins, keep the opening brief so most of your time goes to the reasons and their details. Keep the end for your recommendation, and keep it ready so the recording never cuts you off mid-reason.
What usually goes wrong
Describing your choice without comparing it
It is easy to list the good points of your option and never mention the alternatives, or to talk about what you want instead of what the person needs. Catch it by asking, after each reason, whether you have named what the rejected options lack. If not, add that contrast before moving on.
In your feedback: Off prompt
Reasons with nothing behind them
Saying your choice is cheaper, easier or nicer is only a claim. Back each claim with a detail from the options or a quick picture of how it helps the person. If you hear yourself about to state a new reason before the last one has a detail, stop and add it.
In your feedback: No supporting example
Leaning on the same comparing word
When every point uses the same word for better or good, the argument starts to sound flat. Aim to name the specific advantage instead, such as the saving, the comfort or the time gained. In the moment, if you notice the same word coming again, replace it with the exact benefit you mean.
In your feedback: Repetition
Second-guessing your choice mid-answer
Doubting your choice while you speak leads to hesitation and long silences. Remember that your job is to argue well for the option you picked, not to find a perfect option. If you blank, fall back on your planned order and go to the next reason.
In your feedback: Long pauses
Checking your own work against what is judged
- Content/Coherence
- Content/Coherence: check that your response had a clear shape, with a stated choice, reasons in a sensible order, and a close. Check that each reason had a detail or example and that you could follow the argument from start to end.
- Vocabulary
- Vocabulary: listen for whether you named precise advantages and drawbacks rather than repeating general words. Check that you used words suited to comparing and to talking about the person's needs.
- Listenability
- Listenability: play back a practice recording and notice fillers, stalls and restarts. Check whether a listener could follow your points easily without waiting through silences or untangling half-finished sentences.
- Task Fulfillment
- Task Fulfillment: check that you picked an option, spoke to the named person, compared your choice with the ones you rejected, and finished with a recommendation before the recording ended.
Drafted by an AI writer and passed by a separate AI editor, checked against our content rules: structure and approach only, no wording to reuse. How our content is made
The rest of Speaking
Reading about it only gets you so far
You can read what Task 5 asks. What you cannot read is what it feels like to meet the section's own mechanic while the clock runs. The test drive is where you do that, untimed, unscored and free of your quota.